The Arizona Sentinel

August 5, 2009

Obama’s Mama, Birthing table to ClassRoom, was he born in Canada?

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 8:32 pm

Kuddos to Jerome Corsi for stay with this,.. The question now is , was he born in Canada, they have free health care you know,.. One thing is for certain, these two sure screwed up this kids life.  No wonder he wants to ration health care to seniors.  He’s not sure who to hate, his dad dumped him, his mother dumped him in Hawaii,.. Im still convinced he was born in Kenya,,, but we have to consider Canada,. One thing is certain,.  There must be a very good reason that he will spend all this money to keep his Birth Cert hidden.  Was there a crime involved here? That opens up a whole new can of worms.  One thing is certain, there will be no second term.  I still say he will be gone by the 2010 elections.  see WND below’

Where did all this growing up money come from?  Columbia aint cheap.

Obama Care, DOA in Texas

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 5:40 pm

The Alliance of Texans Against Government

 Controlled Healthcare

Facts about the 10th Amendment

Go to our
Health Care Reform Poll

Live Results

The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791. The Tenth Amendment restates the Constitution’s principle of Federalism by providing that powers not granted to the national government nor prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people.

Why Texans should fight National Healthcare

When all of America’s top health insurers and providers met at the White House this week and pledged to save $2 trillion over the next decade in health costs, they were pledging to sabotage our medical care. The blunt truth, which everybody (the politicians and healthcare providers) agreed to keep quiet, is that the only way to reduce these costs is to ration healthcare, thereby destroying our system. See Details…

The truth about government controlled healthcare

Government healthcare is failing miserably in Massachusetts
If you think a government run healthcare system can work and be more affordable, read this… Click Here…

Article from the Washington Examiner 1/11/09
“Obama’s health policy advisers should take a good look at the smoldering wreckage in the Bay State before trying to impose any such “universal coverage” on the rest of the nation.” Link to Article

More interesting reading – Free Market Cure
Click Here…

Medicare – What is all the fuss about?
Read More…

HCR 50 Has passed the house 99-36!
Affirming that the State of Texas claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates, and providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed.

Take Action! Before it is too late!

Become a member today. Membership is FREE and signing up is quick and easy.

[See the attached file]
Not In Texas, Inc
is a non-profit company.

Our founders are and have been using personal money to fight for what we believe in.

If you would like to send a donation, please mail it to:
1525 N. I-35 E., Suite 125
Carrollton, TX 75006 


HR 11654 Invalidates all So-Called Gun Control Laws

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 2:12 pm
Picture of reservations
Posted 04 August 2009 09:28 PM
If we can wake the masses out of their hypnosis there may be hope for America yet. As more and more states, defend their 10th Amendment rights, this 1902 Bill will ultimately come into play. This video demostrates the disgust Americans have towards the federal government involving self in unconstitutional issues:

Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.


The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654
of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”

The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.

During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.

The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.

Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: “The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”

“This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power.”

The Honorable William Gordon

Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917

Great President of the Past, bush/obama will never make this list

Filed under: My Posts — thearizonasentinel @ 1:56 pm

Obviously those who propose and support amnesty today are not made from the same mold as these great men were. Then again, neither are some of the American citizens and politicians compared to then from the same mold either who support amnesty. Ted? Obama? Kyle? McCain” Reid? Relosi? Boxer? Martinez? Fienstine? Schumer? Tsongas? Barney Franks? Slo Joe Biden? Napalantano? and others too numerous to mention.


               Truman (D)




               Eisenhower (R)



What did
Hoover, Truman, and Eisenhower have in common?

Here is something that
should be of great interest for you to pass around.
I didn’t know of this
until it was pointed out to me.

Back during The Great Depression, President Herbert
Hoover ordered the
deportation of ALL illegal aliens in order to make jobs
available to American
citizens that desperately needed

Harry Truman
deported over two million Illegal’s after WWII to create jobs
for returning

And then again in 1954, President Dwight Eisenhower
deported 1
Mexican Nationals! The program
was called ‘Operation Wetback’. It
done so WWII and Korean Veterans would have a
better chance at jobs.
It took 2 Years, but they
deported them!


Now…if they could deport the illegal’s back then –
they could sure do it today?

lf you have doubts about the veracity of this
information, enter Operation
Wetback into your favorite

and confirm it for yourself.


Reminder: Don’t forget to pay your taxes…
12 to 20
million Illegal Aliens are depending on



Blog at

A Lawman Speaks for Liberty

Border and National Security, Private Property rights, Removing Federal agencies from the states,American Energy Policy, Constitutional Conservative